Legal Opinion

Holland v. City of Chicago

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1997No. 1-95-2491PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hourihane

Plaintiffs, current or former members of the Chicago police and fire departments, who are or will be entitled to receive retirement benefits, brought an action against the City of Chicago (City), various city officials, the trustees of the Policemen’s and Firemen’s Annuity and Benefit Funds (hereafter Policemen’s and Firemen’s Pension Funds or the Funds), and the retirement boards of the Funds (hereafter pension boards or boards), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and damages. The gravamen of plaintiffs’ complaint is that the City failed to report to the pension boards the full amount…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People Ex Rel. Daley v. Datacom Systems Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Eagan v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Buckellew v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Hilligoss v. LaDowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. A.R. v. Chicago Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Smith v. Board of Trustees of the Westchester Police Pension BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Collins v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API