Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

A.R. v. Chicago Board of Education

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 27, 1999No. 1—98—2087PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tully

On December 29, 1997, plaintiffs, A.R., and her mother and legal guardian, M.R., filed an amended complaint against defendants, Laid-law Transit, Inc., and the Chicago Board of Education (Board), seeking compensation for injuries sustained by A.R. as the result of an alleged sexual assault by another student while on the school bus. Count I of the complaint sought recovery against Laidlaw for negligence. Counts II and III sought recovery against the Board for negligence and willful and wanton misconduct, respectively, for failing to prevent or intercede in the assault on A.R. The Board moved…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Henrich v. Libertyville High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DOE EX REL. v. Chicago Bd. of Educ.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Collins v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Village of Sleepy Hollow v. Pulte Home Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. AR Ex Rel. MR v. Chicago Bd. of Educ.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Village of Sleepy Hollow v. Pulte Home Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API