Hilligoss v. LaDow
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P.J.
The issues upon appeal involve health insurance benefits and clothing allowance payments and whether they constitute an inclusive factor upon which police or fire department pensions must be computed.
The case originally involved two separate class actions for mandate. Appellants Hilligoss and Berryman filed suit on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated who are entitled to benefits from the Policemen’s Pension Fund of the City of Kokomo pursuant to I.C. 19-1-24-1 et seq. (Burns Code Ed. 1974). The class was defined as comprising all retired members of the City of Kokomo Police…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Indiana State Highway Commission v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Bynum v. LaPorte Superior Court No. 1Indiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Banish v. City of HamtramckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Epmeier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Cowdin v. HuffIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Seymour National Bank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Livingston v. Consolidated City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Lugar v. State Ex Rel. LeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- Delano v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Merimee v. BrumfieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.