Legal Opinion

Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 25, 2004No. 1-03-0572PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Plaintiffs Adam and Marisa Martin filed an amended class action complaint against defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) arising out of its conduct in settling plaintiffs’ third-party claim against its insured, Bruce Beebe. Therein, plaintiffs pled various theories of recovery including violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (815 ILCS 505/2 (West 2000)), breach of contract, breach of a voluntary undertaking, common law fraud, and breach of a fiduciary duty: Plaintiffs also sought a declaratory judgment. Thereafter, State…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cramer v. Insurance Exchange AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wakulich v. MrazIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Rhodes v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Frye v. Medicare-Glaser Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Greenberger v. GEICO General InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Gore v. Indiana InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Lyerla v. AMCO InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Illinois State Bar Association Mutual Insurance Company v. CavenaghAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API