Legal Opinion
Stealey v. Chessum
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1932No. Docket No. 8108PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is an action to recover for personal injuries. The defendants had judgment and the plaintiff has appealed. About 11 o’clock at night on the twenty-ninth day of.November, 1930, the automobile driven by the defendant George Chessum struck Mrs. Florence S. Adams in the back, knocked her down, and so injured her that she died immediately. The accident occurred at a point about halfway -between Burlingame Avenue and Ralston Avenue on El Camino Real, the highway leading from San Francisco to San Jose. As her sole heir the plaintiff, her brother, commenced this action.
Except as we will mention…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Vedder v. BireleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Dougherty v. EllingsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Burk v. Extrafine Bread BakeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Kinnear v. MartinelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pacific Telephone & Telephone Co. v. WellmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Broun v. BlairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Jones v. HeinrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bamber v. BelprezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Hudson v. RainvilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.