Legal Opinion

Bamber v. Belprez

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1936No. Civ. 10516PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROTH, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs are the widow and children of George Edward Bamber, deceased, who was killed in an accident out of which this action arises. On February 2, 1935, at about 7:30 P. M., defendant was driving an automobile at a speed of approximately 40 miles per hour north on Cherry Avenue at the point of its intersection with 65th Street in the city of Long Beach. At the time defendant crossed the intersection and for some distance prior thereto, he was traveling approximately 75 feet back of another car. In front of the latter car there were several others. The corner of 65th…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kyne v. EusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. North v. VintonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Jenssen v. R. K. O. Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Lafrenz v. StoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Levin v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API