Legal Opinion

Jones v. Heinrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1942No. Civ. 6449PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEEL, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial after judgment entered, upon the verdict of the jury, in favor of the defendant.

The order granting a new trial was general in form and did not specify insufficiency of the evidence as one of the grounds upon which it was based (Code of Civil Procedure, section 657) therefore we will limit our consideration to the errors in law alleged to have been committed by the trial court in granting the motion.

While appellant urged that the evidence shows contributory negligence upon the part of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Tuttle v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Rogers v. Interstate Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Ellison v. Lang Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Howard v. WorthingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Peterson v. BurkhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Wilson v. SibertAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Haerdter v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Fleharty v. BoltzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API