The Newark
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOUGH, Circuit Judge.
This case is one of navigating, or rather moving, in a slip and near the piers bounding the same—a situation always regarded as calling into play the rule of special circumstances. The William A. Jamison, 241 Fed. 950, 154 C. C. A. 586; The Washington, 241 Fed. 952, 154 C. C. A. 588.
Libelant’s tug, the Quigley, was backing out of the slip bounded on one side by a pier,. at the end of which was an office or place of call, to which claimant’s tugs were in the habit of resorting for orders. The Newark, belonging to claimant, approached the pier end, intending to stop there…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The William A. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- The WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- The M. MoranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- McWilliams Bros., Inc. v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth & Dominion Line, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- The Supply No. 4Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Everts v. LatimerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
- Scotia Corp. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Tug Blackjack 21District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.