Legal Opinion

Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Tug Blackjack 21

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 7, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVET, District Judge.

This libel of the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, as owner of the barge known as the Lehigh Valley No. 357, seeks recovery against the tug Blackjack 21, and the tug Peter Moran, and against John J. Reichert, Reichert Towing Line, Inc., and Tug William J. Moran, Inc., and Moran Towing & Transportation Company, as respondents, for damage sustained to the said barge Le-high Valley No. 357 on September 19, 1960, in Gowanus Creek, Brooklyn, New York.

The proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and briefs of the parties having been received, the court, after considering…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. The New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. The AriadneSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beeson v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Complaint of B.F.T. No. Two Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Alamo Chemical Transportation Co. v. M/V Overseas ValdesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API