State v. Silverman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.
The state appeals from a judgment imposing 10-year probationary sentences on defendant on two counts of first-degree sexual abuse. ORS 163.427. The state argues that the trial court erred in ruling that the mandatory minimum prison sentences of 75 months required by ORS 137.700 (Measure 11) were unconstitutionally cruel and unusual and in imposing probationary sentences. We agree and reverse and remand.
Defendant was charged with two counts of first-degree sexual abuse and two counts of second-degree sodomy of a boy under the age of 14 and was charged with three counts of sexual abuse in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. IsomOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. TeagueOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. LavertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. MelilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Doe v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Doe v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017