Legal Opinion
State v. Blacksten
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 5, 1993No. C0-92-621PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WAHL, Justice.
This is a pre-trial criminal appeal by the state 1 from a decision of the court of appeals affirming the trial court’s conclusion that the detention of respondent Kevin Clayton Blacksten was illegal because it “exceeded the permissible length of an investigative stop, occurred far from where the search warrant was to be executed, and began long before the warrant was approved.” State v. Blacksten, 489 N.W.2d 252, 255 (Minn.App.1992). We affirm in part, reverse in part and reinstate the judgment of dismissal.
On January 27, 1992, respondent was charged by complaint in Scott…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. FortSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. FlowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. VerebCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.