Legal Opinion
State v. Flowers
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 2007No. A05-213PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
Dontrell Dyna Flowers was convicted of being a prohibited person in possession of a firearm, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 624.713, subd. 1(b) (2006), after the police found a gun in the vehicle he was driving. Flowers appeals his conviction, arguing that (1) the district court erred when it did not suppress the gun found during the search of the vehicle; (2) the *243court erred when it allowed Flowers to be impeached with a prior conviction; (3) the court erred when it denied Flowers’ motion for a mistrial after an officer improperly testified that the gun was…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. GausterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State of Minnesota v. William Robert Bernard, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. TimberlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State of Minnesota v. Tommy Salyers, IIISupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.