State v. Fort
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This case arises from appellant Musta-faa Naji Fort’s appeal of a court of appeals’ decision reversing an order to suppress cocaine found during a search of his person as part of a routine traffic stop. Fort was a passenger in the vehicle at the time of the traffic stop. In suppressing the cocaine found during the search, the district court held that “in the context of a routine traffic stop, where police do not have an articulable basis to seek consent to search a passenger and fail to inform the passenger of the right to refuse consent to search, a subsequent search…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.