Legal Opinion

State v. Fort

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 2003No. C2-01-1732PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

This case arises from appellant Musta-faa Naji Fort’s appeal of a court of appeals’ decision reversing an order to suppress cocaine found during a search of his person as part of a routine traffic stop. Fort was a passenger in the vehicle at the time of the traffic stop. In suppressing the cocaine found during the search, the district court held that “in the context of a routine traffic stop, where police do not have an articulable basis to seek consent to search a passenger and fail to inform the passenger of the right to refuse consent to search, a subsequent search…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Randall Lee PalsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API