State v. Munson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILBERT, J.
At issue in this appeal from a conviction for possession of cocaine are the trial court’s rulings on a motion to suppress evidence. Specifically, the appellant argues that the trial court committed reversible error in: (1) admitting evidence seized in searches of a vehicle and a residence because the searches were unsupported by probable cause and unreasonable in scope and duration; and (2) admitting a confession that was allegedly obtained in violation of his constitutional right to counsel and in substantial violation' of the rule established in State v. Scales, 518 N.W.2d…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. WiegandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. TenchOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.