Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Holmes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 7, 1933No. 24007PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CULLISON, Y. C. J.
Gerald Holmes, as petitioner, petitioned the Supreme Court, stating that he was unlawfully restrained of his liberty by the marshal of Ponca City, Okla., because of having been convicted of the violation of certain ordinances of the city of said Ponca City, requiring him to pay a license fee as a transient photographer. Said petitioner contends that his imprisonment is illegal and void because the ordinance under which he was convicted is illegal and void.
The record discloses that) Ponca City, Olda., is a municipal corporation, operating under a charter form of government.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- In Re LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Ex Parte RussumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Shipley Baking Co. v. City of HartshorneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cain's Coffee Co. v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- TOCH, LLC v. CITY OF TULSASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- City of McAlester v. Grand Union Tea Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Ex Parte Robert DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Ex Parte StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.