Legal Opinion

Shipley Baking Co. v. City of Hartshorne

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1932No. 21960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. The plaintiff, Shipley Baking Company, began this action in Pittsburg county against the defendant city of Hartshorne, on the 14th day of June, 1930, for an injunction to enjoin said defendant from enforcing ordinance No. 249 of said city of Hartshorne, which was an ordinance imposing an occupational license tax for the purpose of raising revenue.

The pertinent parts of said ordinance No. 249, passed under authority of section 4556, C. O. S. 1921, are as follows:

“Section 1. Por the purpose of raising a revenue for said city,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cain's Coffee Co. v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Ex Parte HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Buckler v. City of GearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API