Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Russum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1932No. 22644PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This is an original proceeding in this court in which the petitioner, Ted Russum, asked this court to discharge him upon a writ of habeas corpus for which he seeks his release from the chief of police of the city of Chickasha, Okla. In his petition, said petitioner alleges, in substance, that he is illegally restrained of his liberty and is held by the chief of police under a warrant issued by the municipal court of the city of Chickasha, charging him with the violation of ordinance No. 1032, in force in said city, requiring the payment of a license fee of $100’, which the city of Chickasha…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cain's Coffee Co. v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Ex Parte HolmesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Izquierdo v. AndradeSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1933
  4. Buckler v. City of GearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API