Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. Murphy

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1941No. Civ. 11538PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for $5,000 in favor of plaintiff, rendered in an action brought by plaintiff for the death of his fifteen-year-old son, Jackie Hernandez, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendants. Defendants urge that the evidence is insufficient, as a matter of law, to show that they were negligent; that the evidence .shows, as a matter of law, that Jackie was guilty of contributory negligence, and that the trial court erred in the giving of certain instructions.

So far as the questions of defendants’ negligence and Jackie’s contributory negligence are…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bellon v. Silver Gate Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Nettrour v. JC Penney CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Kataoka v. May Department Stores Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Satariano v. SleightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API