Legal Opinion

Alabama By-Products Co. v. Landgraff

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1946No. 6 Div. 461PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

Certiorari to the Court of Appeals to 'review their opinion and judgment in a workman’s compensation case.

The findings of the trial court are that the employee had sustained a decreased earning capacity of eighty percent; that he had been employed since his injury, but that he was restored to normal capacity on October 23, 1944, but for 45 weeks prior thereto he was partially disabled; that in that time he received employment of various kinds, without specifying the amount earned, but that it was considerably less than what he had earned before his injury, but not finding that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Voight v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Hulo v. City of New IberiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Nashville Bridge Co. v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Agricola Furnace Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. BF Goodrich Company v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  3. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. DowneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Ex Parte DCH Regional Medical CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. Brunson Milling Co. v. GrimesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API