Legal Opinion
Brunson Milling Co. v. Grimes
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided May 22, 1958No. 3 Div. 809PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAKELY, Justice.
This is a suit under the Alabama Workmen’s Compensation Law (Code of 1940, Title 26, § 253 et seq.), instituted by Fate Grimes (appellee) against his ' employer, Brunson Milling Company,-Inc.,-a corporation (appellant) to recover compensation for injuries and resulting disability ■ which he alleged was caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.
The circuit court found that Grimes was permanently disabled within the meaning of § 279(E) 3, Title 26, Code of 1940, as a result of said injuries. It awarded Grimes compensation for a period of 400 weeks…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lee v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Berg v. SadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Deaton Truck Line, Inc. v. AckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Bell v. DriskillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Eley v. Brunner-Lay Southern Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Mead Paper Co. v. BrizendineCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Defense Ordinance Corporation v. EnglandCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
- Stewart v. BusbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.