Legal Opinion

Hulo v. City of New Iberia

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 26, 1923No. 24711PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

This is a suit under the workmen’s compensation statute (Act No. 20 of 1914), and the only question involved is the amount of compensation plaintiff should receive. It is admitted that plaintiff was severely injured in' the course of his employment as an electric lineman by defendant. It is admitted that he is entitled to compensation for permanent partial dis*285ability, and that his compensation should be 55 per cent of the difference between what he was earning at the time of the injury and what he is now able to earn. It is admitted that the compensation should continue for 300 weeks. It is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norwood v. Lake Bisteneau Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  3. Thornton v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  4. Lindsey v. Continental Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  5. Becton v. Deas Paving Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API