Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Whelan Drug Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 25, 1955No. Civ. 20389PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action for an injunction, declaratory relief and damages against a lessee for breach of a lease, plaintiffs appeal, urging that the relief granted by the trial court was inadequate and not all that they sought.
Facts: * Prior to March 5, 1941, H. B. Garfield was the owner of and engaged in the business of operating a chain of drugstores in the county of Los Angeles under the fictitious firm name of Mid-City Drug Stores.
On March 5, .1941, Mr. Garfield and his wife, as lessees and appellants, F. W. Hicks and Bernice Ann Hicks, as lessors, executed a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Achen v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
- Saks & Co. v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Masciotra v. HarlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Selber Bros. v. Newstadt's Shoe StoresSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Key v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Carter v. AdlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Kroger Co. v. Bonny Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- 1st Olympic Corp. v. HawrylukCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Brandt v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.