Legal Opinion
Carter v. Adler
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 1955No. Civ. 21179PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
From a judgment declaring that the lease to defendants does prevent plaintiffs (landlords of defendants) from conducting a supermarket on an adjoining parcel for the sale of merchandise specified in the lease to be sold exclusively by defendants, plaintiffs appeal.
Respondents’ original lease was in writing, executed by Williams and Keeler under date of August 20, 1951, and the land will be referred to herein as Parcel 1. The premises demised to respondents and designated as Units 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 20, 21, 22 and 23 of a larger parcel of realty were owned by Williams and Keeler and are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Cousins Investment Co. v. Hastings Clothing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Levins v. RovegnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Keating v. PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Slice v. Carozza Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Bailey v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Parker v. the Lewis Grocery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Village Enterprises, Inc. v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.