Achen v. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, J. pro tem.
We are told by appellants that “The issue in this appeal is whether ‘Thou Shalt Not Steal’ applies to the soft drink distributing business. ’ ’ If that were the only issue we feel we would be compelled to answer it, as appellants would have us do, by stating that the quotation does apply to the business mentioned, and, for authority, we would content ourselves with citing the Seventh Commandment. The issue, however, as we see it, while equally as simple as the one stated by appellants, is whether under the terms of written contracts the plaintiffs severally were entitled to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of MacHinists, Local 1304California Court of Appeal · 1964
- City of Berkeley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Efron v. KalmanovitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- United Steelworkers of America v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- McGee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.