Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Workmens Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 1987No. Appeal, No. 2028 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Colins,

Carol C. Roberts (claimant) appeals an order of the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referees dismissal of her claim for workmens compensation as barred by the three year statute of limitations applicable to such proceedings. See Section 315 of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §602.

Claimant was employed by Merck, Sharp & Dohme (employer) as a machine operator when she suffered an allergic reaction on February 25, 1976, allegedly in re*116sponse to contaminants distributed by a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Dudley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. NiemannCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Taglianetti v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tooley v. AlmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Schreffler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. NUS Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Bergmeister v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API