Legal Opinion

Ylen v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

The facts here recited are undisputed. In fact, they appear from the affidavit of plaintiffs’ attorney submitted in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment. It is therefore unnecessary for us to consider the question whether the affidavit of defendant’s attorney is based solely upon hearsay and therefore inadequate to support its motion.

The action was commenced on January 8, 1952, by George and Hilia Ylen to recover damages sustained by them on account of injuries sustained by their infant daughter, Rachel, on November 1, 1948, as the result of being struck by an automobile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mulvey v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Guse v. A. O. Smith Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Wysocki v. Wisconsin Lakes Ice & Cartage Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Ullman v. FreyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Shovers v. HahnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Korth v. American Family Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Will v. JessenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ausen v. MoriartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Zielke v. Wausau Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1982
  5. Bulgrin v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API