Legal Opinion
Will v. Jessen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1956PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWingert, J.
It is undisputed that no notice of injury conforming to the requirements of sec. 330.19 (5), Stats., was served on either the driver or owner of the truck which caused the injury, within two years after the date of the accident. Service of a notice of injury on the Insurance Company was not a compliance with the statute, which requires service on “the person or corporation by whom it is claimed such damage was caused.” Ylen v. Mutual Service Casualty Ins. Co. 263 Wis. 270, 272, 57 N. W. (2d) 391; Ausen v. Moriarty, 268 Wis. 167, 177, 67 N. W. (2d) 358. The attempt to serve the notice on the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hilker v. Western Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- McDonald v. City of Spring ValleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Murphy v. . Village of Fort EdwardNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Cohan v. Associated Fur Farms, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Oertel v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Leszczynski v. SurgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Stevens v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- Ocampo v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Peters v. KellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Lang v. City of CumberlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.