Ullman v. Freye

The sole question before us is the sufficiency of the notice of injury. It is attacked only for the reason that the date of the accident is not specified therein. The defendants contend that the omission of the date is a fatal defect and because thereof it does not comply with the requirements of sec. 330.19 (5), Stats. They rely upon several cases decided by this court which we shall review briefly, in the order they are set out in the brief herein.

In Voss v. Tittel, 219 Wis. 175, 262 N. W. 579, a summons, affidavit, notice of examination, of adverse party, and a subpoena were issued within…