Legal Opinion

Bulgrin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1963Published

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Mrs. Bulgrin did not comply with sec. 330.19 (5), Stats. 1953. That statute required that notice be served “upon the person or corporation by whom it is claimed such damage was caused.” We are unable to find any reason to excuse her from complying with the terms of the statute. We are also unable to locate any expression of the legislature or statement by this court which would exculpate Mrs. Bul-grin from the duty of compliance.

While the legislature had previously amended this section of the statutes so as to remove the strict…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burmek v. Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Will v. JessenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ausen v. MoriartyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Ylen v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Howrahan v. BrandtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API