Legal Opinion
State v. Wetzel
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 22, 2008No. 20080042PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] John Douglas Wetzel appeals from an order deferring the imposition of his sentence, entered after the district court denied his motion to dismiss criminal charges against him for terrorizing, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and criminal mischief, and he conditionally pled guilty to the charges under N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2). Wetzel argues the Burleigh County State’s Attorney does not have jurisdiction to prosecute criminal charges for offenses alleged to have been committed on the channel of the Missouri River. We hold the Burleigh County State’s Attorney has…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. LaibNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Harter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. Van BeekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Baukol Builders, Inc. v. County of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. O'ConnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- M.M. v. Fargo Public School District No. 1North Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- STATE, EX REL. HARRIS v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.