Legal Opinion
Saarstahl Ag v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 29, 1997No. Slip Op. 97-67. Court No. 93-04-00219PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are motions for Judgment on the Agency Record made by plaintiff Saarstahl AG (“Saarstahl”) and defendantintervenor Inland Steel Bar Company (“Inland”) pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 56.2. Plaintiff argues the Department of Commerce’s (“Department” or “Commerce”) decision in Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Hot Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products From Germany, 58 Fed.Reg. 6,233 (Dep’t Comm.1993) (“Final Affirmative Determination” or “Certain Hot Rolled Lead”) as modified by Remand Determination: Certain Hot Rolled Lead…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- LTV Steel Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Saarstahl Ag v. United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant, and Inland Steel Bar Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Saarstahl Ag v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997