Legal Opinion
Trunz Pork Stores, Inc. v. Wallace
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 30, 1934No. 267PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
This petition is filed to set aside an order to cease and desist as unfair, discriminatory, and deceptive a practice of petitioner paying a commission, through a broker, on the sale of its pork products to the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company. The order was entered after notice and a hearing, by the Secretary of Agriculture, pursuant to section 203 of the Packers & Stockyards Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 159, 161, 7 USCA § 193). The condemned practice consisted of refunding or remitting brokerage commissions by a broker to the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company.
Petitioner,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Southern Railway Co. v. PrescottSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. DiffenbaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. New York Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Biddle Purchasing Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Oliver Bros. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Crosse & Blackwell Company, a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- Fairbank v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.