Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 5, 1934No. 194PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This ease comes here on certiorari to review a decree of the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission forbidding certain trade practices of respondent as an unfair method of competition. 63 F. (2d) 81; § 5, Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 717, 719.

The Commission found that respondent, one of nhmer-ous candy manufacturers similarly engaged, manufactures, sells and distributes, in interstate commerce, package assortments of candies known to the trade as-“break and take ” packages, in competition with manufacturers of assortments…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API