Legal Opinion
Fairbank v. Hardin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1970No. 23705PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
After a public hearing, held under the provisions of the Packers & Stockyards Act, 7 U.S.C. § 181 et seq., the respondent Secretary1 found and concluded that Arnold Fairbank, d/b/a Arnold Fairbank Cattle Company, the respondents in the administrative proceeding, willfully violated 7 U.S.C. §§ 213(a) and 221 and Regulations 9 C.F.R. §§ 201.46 and 201.55 by: (1) selling livestock at false weights, (2) issuing invoices to the purchasers showing the false weights, (3) collecting payments from the purchasers ■ on the basis of the false weights, (4) making copies of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Atlantic Richfield Company v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Glover Livestock Commission Company, Inc. v. Clifford M. Hardin, Secretary of Agriculture, and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Spencer Livestock Commission Company Mike Donaldson v. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Blackfoot Livestock Commission, Co. v. Department of Agriculture, Packers and Stockyards AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Andresen v. BAR ASS'N OF MONT. CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.