Legal Opinion
United States v. New York Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 24, 1949No. 9221PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINTON, Circuit Judge.
This case comes to us on appeal from the Eastern District of Illinois. The defendant The New York Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., herein called A&P, several of its subsidiary and affiliated companies, and certain officers of -the A&P chain were found guilty .by the District Court of a conspiracy to restrain and to monopolize trade, in violation of Sections 1 and 2.of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S. C.A. §§ 1, 2. The defendants Carl Byoir, the public relations counsel of A&P, and Business Organization, Inc., a -corporation through which Byoir conducted such public…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Associated Press v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- The Travelers Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Blue Cross of Western Pennsylvania, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Ben Corbin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Richard Goldwasser, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Ameritech CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.