Interstate Commerce Commission v. Diffenbaugh
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
These are appeals from injunctions issued upon bills brought by the appellees against the enforcement of two orders made by the Interstate Commerce Commission. 176 Fed. Rep. 409. The stages by which the Commission came to its present conclusion, against its earlier view, will be found reported in 10 I. C. C. Rep. 309, 12 id. 85, 14 id. 315. See 14 id. 317, 510, 551. In the Circuit Court these cases were tried upon the same evidence and they raise the same question; but as the Peavey suit presents that question in its initial and simplest form we will state the facts of that case first.
•The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BehlmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. StickneySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Penn Refining Co. v. Western New York & Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Southern Railway Co. v. St. Louis Hay & Grain Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
3Cited by101 opinions
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.