Legal Opinion

Gray v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Adams, J., at July Term, 1914, of RaN-dolph.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

Tbis is an action for tbe wrongful killing of tbe plaintiff’s intestate, under tbe United States Employers’ Liability act, cb. 149, 35 Statutes at Large, 65, amended cb. 143, Statutes at Large.

Exceptions 1 and 2 are that issues as to tbe amount of damages by reason of tbe negligence of tbe defendant and of plaintiff’s contributory negligence were not submitted to tbe jury as separate and distinct issues. But tbe statute does not require tbis. Tbe court instructed tbe jury, in accordance witb tbe statute, to assess tbe damages by reason of tbe death of tbe intestate, if they found it was due…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. EarnestSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Hodges v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Ray v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Arrowood v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Hodges v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Treadwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Sears v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. United States v. SaulsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API