Legal Opinion

Hodges v. . Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1914PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action was brought for the cancellation or reformation of a deed, the plaintiff alleging that it conveyed 76 1/2 acres of land, contrary to the agreement of the parties that it should pass only 10 acres, and that this was brought about by the fraud of A. R. Wilson, the grantee, and the mistake of Isham Hodges, the grantor, induced thereby.

The original parties died pending the suit, and their heirs were brought in by order of the court.

Plaintiffs amended their complaint by stating that Isham Hodges, their ancestor, was not mentally capable of making the deed at the time of its alleged…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Hunt v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Tarkington v. Printing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API