Legal Opinion

Arrowood v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1900PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The first exception for permitting the use of the map can not be sustained as it was admitted merely to explain the witness's testimony, and as a part thereof. Riddle v. Germanton, 117 N.C. 387, and cases cited;Tankard v. R. R., ibid., 558.

The Court instructed the jury that if they found from the evidence "that this was a public passway, as heretofore defined, and that the engineer, by reason of the curve in the road and the obstruction of the smokestack, could not keep a proper lookout for persons on the track, and that the fireman could have done so, then it would have been the duty of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Pickett v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Lloyd v. Albemarle & Raleigh R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Lassiter v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Powell v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. State v. KincaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Mintz v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Shepherd v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. State v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API