Sears v. Texas & N. O. Ry. Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtStayton, J.
The application for writ of error presents the question of whether, under the federal Employers’ Liability Act (U. S. Comp. St. §§ 8667-8665), the defendant railway company owed to its brakeman, Eugene Sears, any duty of maintaining a lookout to discover and avoid running into and killing him with one of its trains, where, as the evidence shows, he was at the time of the accident lying asleep perilously near its track in pursuance of no right.
The widow of Sears brought the suit individually, as next friend of the children of the marriage who were minors and whom she joined, and as temporary…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. Jin Fuey MoySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Voorhees v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Wichita Falls, R. & F. W. Ry. Co. v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. GibsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.