Legal Opinion

United States v. Sauls

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1933No. 3468PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal in a war risk insurance case. The government contends that verdict should have been directed in its favor, but we think that the evidence as to total and permanent disability existing at the time that the policy is claimed to have lapsed was sufficient to take the case to the jury. There was no work record. There was evidence that from the time of his discharge from the army plaintiff was unable to work as a result of a combination of diseases from which he was suffering, that he was unable because of his physical condition to carry on the vocational training which the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Marks v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Camden v. DoremusSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Lambert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  5. United States v. West Coast News CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API