Legal Opinion
Palacios v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 4, 1995No. CA A75545 (Control), A76804PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of two orders of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board) pertaining to the setting of his parole release date. We affirm.
The facts in this case are undisputed. In 1985, petitioner was convicted of four counts of solicitation to commit aggravated murder,1 ORS 163.095, two of which were merged for sentencing; four counts of distribution of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1); and one count of possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4). He was sentenced to three consecutive 20-year terms, each with a 10-year minimum. ORS 144.110.
At his initial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Roof v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Williams v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Jeldness v. Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George W. Nulph v. Dave Cook, Director of the Department of Corrections Hardy Myers, Attorney General of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- George W. Nulph v. Dave Cook, Director of the Department of Corrections Hardy Myers, Attorney General of the State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003