Legal Opinion

Kiehne v. Atwood

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1979No. 12478PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASLEY, Justice.

Kalvin Zeno Kiehne, plaintiff-appellee, sued Robert A. Atwood, defendant-appellant, to invalidate the latter’s election as Catron County Clerk. The trial court held Atwood’s election invalid and declared Kiehne the winner. Atwood appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Since Atwood’s winning margin was two votes, we could dispose of this cause by affirming the invalidation of any three of the votes. Normally this Court exercises judicial restraint by addressing only those issues the answers to which will conclude the dispute between the parties. However, numerous…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Wood v. State Ex Rel. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Boardman v. EstevaSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. Burroughs v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS, CTY., BERNALILLONew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sommerfeld v. Board of CanvassersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Fugate v. Mayor and City Council of Town of BuffaloWyoming Supreme Court · 1960

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Granados Navedo v. Rodríguez EstradaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1990
  3. McCavitt v. Registrars of Voters of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Roe v. Mobile County Appointment Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. American Ass'n of People With Disabilities v. HerreraDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API