Legal Opinion

Michak v. Transnation Title Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 2003No. 71783-4PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

In reviewing the trial court’s dismissal on summary judgment of an insured’s breach of contract claim, we must initially determine whether a title insurance company was contractually precluded from amending, prior to issuing its policy, the legal description of the subject property included in its preliminary title commitment. If we determine that the preliminary commitment contained no such bar, we must then consider whether, by initialing at closing the corrected one-page legal description of the property, the insured accepted the insurer’s amendment of the description in its preliminary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Grimwood v. University of Puget Sound, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Retail Clerks Health & Welfare Trust Funds v. Shopland Supermarket, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Michak v. Transnation Title Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. International Marine Underwriters v. ABCD Marine, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Ross v. KirnerWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Lowman v. WilburWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Ross v. KirnerWashington Supreme Court · 2007

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API