Legal Opinion
Moore v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 23, 1983No. 82-1175PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Appellant argues that the trial court’s decision to sentence him under the Federal Youth Corrections Act (FYCA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 5005-5026, after revoking his probation, violated Superior Court Criminal Rule 35. Concluding that appellant misapprehends the purpose of Rule 35 and its relationship to D.C.Code § 24-104 (1981) (governing probation revocation), we affirm.
I
On November 13, 1981, appellant pleaded guilty to an information charging him with violation of the Bail Reform Act. D.C.Code § 23-1327 (1981). The court sentenced him to one year’s imprisonment but suspended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richard B. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Augustus E. Harvin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Jerome F. Donelson, United States of America v. Andre WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Richard A. Jackson, A/K/A "John Harris,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Mulky v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. PabloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Veney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Veney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995