Legal Opinion · Dissent

Veney v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1995No. 93-CF-456Published

1DissentFerren, Associate Judge

This decision and the one issued several days before it, Peterson v. United States, 657 *632A.2d 756 (D.C.1995), reflect a remarkable result. Two divisions of this court decide the same issue- — holding that a sentencing judge can lawfully deny Youth Rehabilitation Act (YRA) treatment to an eligible youth offender without need for an explicit finding that the youth “will not derive benefit” from such treatment — even though that issue has not been raised or briefed or orally argued on appeal by any party in either case. (Indeed, the court put Peterson on the summary calendar without oral…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. Edwin Charles Fortes, Jr., United States of America v. Sandra Elaine JemisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  5. Hughes v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API