Legal Opinion

Veney v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1995No. 93-CF-456Published

1Opinion of the Court

658 A.2d 625 (1995)

Tycho VENEY, Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Appellee.

No. 93-CF-456.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued October 6, 1994.

Decided April 20, 1995.

Tana Lin, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Samia Fam, Public Defender Service, were on brief, for appellant.

Laura A. Cordero, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Atty., and John R. Fisher, Elizabeth Trosman, and Karen E. Rhew, Asst. U.S. Attys., were on brief, for appellee.

Before FERREN, TERRY, and SCHWELB, Associate Judges.

2Per curiam

Following his guilty plea to manslaughter while armed, D.C.Code §§…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

3Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API