Legal Opinion

Barth v. Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corp.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 17, 2000No. 97-4174-SACPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CROW, Senior District Judge.

This case is before the court on thirty-two separate motions for summary judgment, and one motion for partial summary judgment filed by the defendant, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation. The plaintiffs bring this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) action as employees of defendant’s System Engineering or Support Engineering departments, seeking to recover unpaid compensation for hours worked in excess of forty hours a week during the time in question. 1

The standards and procedures for summary judgment are well established and will not be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Edward W. Dalheim v. Kdfw-TvCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. United Video, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Ronald L. Aaron, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, Defendant-Appellant/, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. David Rutlin v. Prime Succession, Inc. Kerley & Starks Funeral Homes, Inc., Jointly and SeverallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. De Jesus-Rentas v. Baxter Pharmacy Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  2. Pippins v. KPMG LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  3. Grandits v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Nickell v. City of Lawrence, Kan.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API