Legal Opinion
Tampax, Inc. v. Personal Products Corporation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 18, 1941No. Civ. 1397PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is a suit for the alleged infringement of two patents.
1. Patent No. 1,964,911, issued to Earle C., Haas, for catamenial device, granted July 3, 1934, on an application filed May 22, 1933,-of which Claim 1 is in suit.
2. Patent No. 2,024,218, issued to Earle C. Haas, for catamenial device, granted December 17, 1935, on an application filed June 2, 1934, of which Claims 1, 2 and 3 are in suit.
The first patent aforesaid, No. 1,964,911, in the specification states “This invention relates to a catamenial device, and the process of manufacturing the same. It relates…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
- In re TenneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Application of William L. Tenney, Paul A. Frank and Scoville E. KnoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Unistrut Corporation v. PowerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.