Legal Opinion

Unistrut Corporation v. Power

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided December 18, 1958No. Civ. A. 54-961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

In their bill of complaint the plaintiffs include five distinct causes of action and they will be treated as such. The actions center around the activities of both parties with respect to the production, promotion and sales of articles covered by patents numbered 2,345,650 issued on April 4, 1944, on an application filed on October 12, 1940 and 2,696,139 issued on December 7, 1954, on an application dated May 28, 1952. The complaint alleges (a) unfair competition on the part of the defendants, (b) infringement of the plaintiffs’ patents and (c) infringement of plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pic Design Corp. v. Bearings Specialty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  2. Hedeman Products Corp. v. Tap-Rite Products Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
  3. Pic Design Corp. v. Bearings Specialty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API